It won't work without breaking taboos
Interview with Albert Schäfer, the
manager of the ARD/ZDF Children's Channel
The young children's series Teletubbies
has given the ARD/ZDF Children's Channel (Der Kinderkanal),too,
a sense of greater achievement. This is helping it to establish
itself as a safe haven for public service children's television.
IZI:
The future of public service children's television a colleague
of yours recently wrote lies in the Children's Channel. Is that
right?
Schäfer: The future lies in the
Children's Channel if strong children's departments continue to
exist within the ARD and ZDF. In this combination I, too, believe
that the future lies in the Children's Channel. This is simply tied
up with two things: in our diverse media landscape children need
to have somewhere to go to where they can expect continuity and
security. They find that in the Children's Channel. Secondly, the
success of the Children's Channel, which was, of course, surprising
for many even inside the ARD and ZDF ,is, so to speak, a prerequisite
for further success. And, as matters stand, I'm convinced that the
Children's Channel will have a good and long future: as a kind of
advertisement for public service children's programmes, but only
as I said with the help of the great efforts of experienced
producers in the other non-commercial corporations.
IZI: In recent times the - now famous
- Teletubbies have contributed to the success of the Children's
Channel. Was this an instinctive purchase rather than a cool calculation?
Schäfer: It was more of an instinctive
decision. I had something to do at Erfurt for a few days for the
Children's Channel and read a notice about a new programme in England
and wanted to see it. We then looked at it, and I was I openly
admit it in the beginning surprised if not nonplussed by such
a programme, which there hadn't been any examples of up to then
and which at first does have a disconcerting effect on adults. That's
the effect it had on me. All the same, I had a feeling that it was
something special.
IZI: What is special about it?
Schäfer: The Teletubbies
give pleasure to a target group for which there had so far been
no explicit programme. And to that extent it is a kind of violation
of a taboo, particularly for the Children's channel, which triggered
very fierce public discussions. Even so, I think it is right and
justifiable to broadcast this programme. We are now getting feedback
from parents I wouldn't have expected. They write quite frankly
when and what their young children watch on television - and that
up to now there hasn't been anything for them. Or that they watched
with their elder siblings, but the programme was not for them. It
is often the case that there are two or three children in the family,
a six-year-old boy, a nine-year-old girl, and a two and a half-
or three-year-old boy as well. And he watches television on Sunday,
too, or whenever it is. For him there wasn't a programme. A gap
has now been filled in and at the same time a taboo has been broken.
That is one reason for the success. The other reason is that this
programme format breaks with certain traditions it gets away from
adapting children's television from the formats of programmes for
adults. Many wonderful children's programmes from ARD and ZDF
I'll just mention Siebenstein which are made very lovingly,
but are adapted from adult formats in their production, in their
dramatisation. That means the story is told using parallel plots;
the cutting is used in a definite way. With the Teletubbies
that is different, and that at first upsets adults, because this
programme is quite radically tailored to television beginners: with
the repetitions, with the slow pace, with the different language
levels. There is not only the blah-blah level; but also the correct
language level. There are at least three language levels. That alarms
people, and this together with the attention associated with it
are part of the success.
IZI: Quite a lot was changed for the
German children.
Schäfer: We didn't only dub the
series, but we remade about half of the inside parts. These are
the scenes from the English original which don't altogether fit
in with our children's environment here in Germany. For example,
children in school uniforms, left-hand traffic on the road and suchlike.
That, we thought, was necessary to tally with children's life experience
here that was one thing. Secondly, we also wanted to show deliberately
that it was not just a purchase, but we want to show children in
Germany children who talk, who sing. Although that's possible
by dubbing, it's not so simple. And it must be made clear to the
viewing children: it's really taking place in your surroundings,
it has something to do with you. It was possible with some of the
original film inserts, but not with others. So we decided to remake
about half of them.
IZI: A lot of parents like the programme.
But some are indifferent and others are opposed to the programme
because they feel that their educational efforts are being undermined.
Schäfer: I understand the criticism
and also the annoyance. Nevertheless, I think it's necessary to
stick to our position. If you look at the last few decades, the
tradition of public service children's programmes is not just the
good, accepted children's programme, which manages to find everybody's
common denominator, but a taboo violation has always been involved.
The best example is Sesame Street. There were discussions
about the age from which children watch television; there were resolutions
passed about allowing them to start doing so at the age of six.
You can't pass a resolution in a committee about the minimum age
for watching television, and something quite different happens in
living rooms, bedrooms and children's rooms. That means that violating
a taboo by public service television also has a tradition. And has
also advanced television. Sesame Street is one example, Rappelkiste
another. The Sendung mit der Maus, too, was at first basically
a taboo violation. If public television hasn't the courage to break
with old ideas in order to advance the children's programme in the
discussion, nobody else will do so. The private television companies
only break taboos which have something to do with commerce, with
a certain kind of dramtisation, with action and violence, but they
will not advance the actual discussion on children's television.
That is something the public service corporations have to do, and
for that this discussion, too, has to be conducted and accepted.
IZI: But public service children's
television does not collide with the parents' educational ideas.
Schäfer: If I might mention Rappelkiste
again: it also took a stand against parents. At least that was the
subject of discussion at that time. I myself then spoke at great
length with the responsible producer about it. So to that extent
that also existed in some areas. Not the whole of the Children's
Channel works against the parents and I believe it doesn't do
so with the Teletubbies either. The Children's Channel now
has an additional programme in its scheme which really does give
rise to fierce discussions. That doesn't mean we have set off in
a completely new direction. I believe that in one or two years this
programme will be assessed differently by the public and that then
it will be regarded as an interesting building-block for media education.
IZI: You're purchasing a new pre-school
series from the USA: The Bear in the Big Blue House. A programme
similar to the Teletubbies or something in more traditional
style this time?
Schäfer: That's the right description.
The programme again has a more traditional feeling about it. The
if I may use the expression public service parents you were
talking about will certainly not be annoyed by it, as it is in the
tradition of what they know. Even so, this programme has great charm,
great emotionality, and I'm wondering what kind of effect the package,
so to speak, of the Teletubbies and The Bear in the Big
Blue House will have on the viewers and the parents. I'm certain
there will be less discussion about it, also less attention paid
to it, but a lot of agreement and a lot of success.
IZI: There is also much discussion
about what is going on all around the Teletubbies series.
Under the term merchandising over 100 products are on sale, mainly
toys and children's clothing. What does the Children's Channel get
out of these sales?
Schäfer: We do get something
from the sales, in that merchandising contributes to making the
programme popular. That is a marketing measure. That's something
we can admit quite openly. Nor is it anything new. When you see
how much merchandising there is in connection with the Mouse,
the Tigerente and with Tabaluga, that is with programmes
from ARD and ZDF, there are certainly just as many different articles
offered for sale. I don't know the exact figures at the moment;
nor do I know what the revenues are there ? But it is the case that
merchandising in connection with a children's programme did not
start with the Teletubbies. It has a tradition going back
a few years. To that extent what is special about merchandising
the Teletubbies is merely the great success. But that, in
turn, has something to do with the popularity, with the special
attention paid to this programme.
IZI: BBC Worldwide has earned well
over £55m from the merchandising articles alone.
Schäfer: Television and commerce
belong together in children's television and apparently in public
service television as well. Though here I must point out that children's
television also needs this additional source of revenue for it to
be financed worldwide. As long as children's television is not provided
with the same financial means as prime-time television for adults,
it is necessary over and beyond the profit expectations of producer
and licence dealers to handle merchandising on that scale, since
many programmes could never be made or be funded without this additional
source of revenue. I must say, however, that I'm not in favour of
now considering the merchandising of the Teletubbies in isolation.
If you look at a child's room you can see that the godmother, the
grandmother, the parents and friends and others as well are constantly
giving the children presents: soft toys, rag dolls, all conceivable
articles. Children's rooms are full of these things. That was the
case before and with the Teletubbies. The Teletubbies
have expanded the assortment by several products, but they didn't
invent merchandising. You could say cynically that the tormented
relatives have a new chance to give the children something new at
Christmas or for their birthday. You can sometimes see the helplessness
in their faces when they have to give the poor little children a
present. That means that this consumption situation exists even
without the Teletubbies and their articles.
IZI: The children's television market
is constantly changing. New programmes are coming from SAT.1, RTL
and Pro 7, and foreign competitors, too, are getting ready to start.
How, then, do you see the position of the Children's Channel in
this competitive environment?
Schäfer: When Nickelodeon
stopped transmitting, we were held jointly responsible by some
something I've never understood, as Nickelodeon was doing
quite well. It was a purely economic decision. It only showed us
how necessary it is to have a public service Children's Channel,
because children and parents can't rely on children's programmes
from the private companies, as these are dependent on profit expectations,
and if the profits are not right, the station is simply closed down.
The Children's Channel, on the other hand, provides continuation
irrespective of these economic considerations. Now new ones are
being added. That's why SAT.1 and that has something to do with
EM.TV and Junior-TV, with a big stock of programmes, with much too
much money, which is available by going onto the stock exchange
and has to be put to good use somewhere whether they want to or
not, are also getting a children's programme, which will be starting
up soon. I don't see any particular danger here, as the plums from
the so-called Junior Package, they are at ZDF and the Children's
Channel, and not at SAT.1. Things will get more interesting again
in the next few years, with digital television, with regard to enlarging
the programme. The Disney Channel is starting up, and then Fox Kids
will soon arrive on the scene and others, too. I'm watching all
this with interest just like all the other programme providers.
And we'll also discover that the cake won't get any bigger, but
the pieces of cake will get smaller for everyone including the
Children's Channel. But if you see a danger in this programme enlargement,
then I see this danger more for other competitors. So the Disney
Channel in the digital package is more likely to give Super RTL
a headache, as they also have Disney programmes. That means that
then there will be two channels with Disney programmes. When Fox
Kids comes, that, because of its programme philosophy, will affect
other competitors rather than the Children's Channel. And that's
why I'm watching the new programme providers with interest and vigilance,
but I'm not worried as far as the Children's Channel is concerned.
I think we have a rather different position in this market. Of course,
we, too, have to be and want to be popular and seen; but we want
to be, above all, indispensable. We want to provoke discussion,
we want to be an opinion leader, we want to venture into new programme
formats, and we want not only and that's something we don't need
to do to look to quantitative success.
IZI: Will the Children's Channel programmes
that have proved successful also be shown in the ARD Third Programmes,
the regional programmes perhaps even the Teletubbies?
Schäfer: The Teletubbies
can already be seen in the Third programmes not yet everywhere,
but I think to an increasing extent at any rate, they can already
be seen in some of the Third programmes. And we have just learnt
that there, too, (by looking hard enough) the viewers are apparently
finding them.
IZI: The Children's Channel has managed
to attract many young children in front of the television set. Is
that all right with you?
Schäfer: That suits me fine,
as I would rather and I can say this quite frankly the children,
even the young ones, watched the Children's Channel than any other
channel, where they see not only other programmes with a different
philosophy, with different dramatisation, with a different pace
and so on, and perhaps commercials as well, which we certainly don't
have and never will have. For that reason, when children watch television
and that is the reality then they should watch the Children's
Channel and not another programme.
INFORMATION
Internationales
Zentralinstitut
für das Jugend-
und Bildungsfernsehen
IZI
Tel.: +49 89 - 59 00 21 40
Fax.: +49 89 - 59 00 23 79
eMail: izi@brnet.de
COPYRIGHT
© Internationales Zentralinstitut für
das Jugend- und Bildungsfernsehen (IZI)
|